Monday, June 27, 2016

A Question of Loyalty - How to Leverage Loyalty Programs to Supercharge Corporate Responsibility

Mark Caduc
David Clemmons

By Mark Caduc and David Clemmons

As corporate responsibility becomes more mature as a practice, and better integrated into the day to day business of most companies, the expectations of CR leaders for greater impact and accountability are rising. Initiatives like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) are helping to standardize CR reporting, but a big question remains. Is better reporting enough?

Purpose-driven companies, particularly those with consumer-facing brands are missing a golden opportunity to increase both the visibility and the impact of their CR efforts, while changing the fundamental relationship with their best customers.

Enter the loyalty program

Loyalty programs are pervasive in today’s consumption-driven economy. Buy a dozen donuts, bagels or croissants and get the 13th free (except, perhaps, for some unwanted calories). Worry not though, your local gym has the answer to that – a free-month when you get a friend to sign up for a new membership.

Credit cards, airlines, hotels, travel websites – all let you earn points. The motivation to spend is linked to the benefits of spending (the rewards). And oh the things we’ll do for free stuff – discounts, cash back, trips, stays, coffee.

Are traditional loyalty programs outdated?

Two problems with loyalty programs are differentiation and value perception. According to a 2015 loyalty census by Colloquy, there are an average of 29 loyalty program memberships for every American household, but only 12 of those are active[1]. To make matters worse, about a third ($16 billion) of the $48 billion worth of loyalty points earned each year in the U.S. are never used.[2] There are now so many loyalty programs that it is hard for consumers to differentiate one from another and to see the value of those programs. Loyalty occurs not when points are earned, but when they are redeemed. It is only then that a company fulfills its promise to give back something of value to the customer in return for their repeat business. By this standard, many loyalty programs are failing to deliver on one of their primary purposes – to create loyal customers.  

What is the link to CR?

Imagine if those $16 billion per year in unused loyalty points could be used to fund CR projects instead. 

The Internet and social media have created a new, more demanding breed of consumer. The modern consumer actually has three very distinct personalities which at any time manifest themselves to a greater or lesser degree. We call these “Materialistic Me”, “Social Me” and “Altruistic Me”.

As each of us have become social media stars in our own version of the online fame game, loyalty programs that merely reward their customers with stuff for themselves “Materialistic Me” will not satisfy the desires of a generation born into a society where recognition is measured in terms of followers, friends, thumbs ups, likes, and re-tweets – the emerging “Social Me”.

Social Me is a global citizen, visible and accessible to all. It is the global personification of oneself online, which challenges traditional egocentric and ethnocentric models. It represents the emergence of a self that, at the very least, considers people other than oneself, immediate family, and close personal friends. Typical loyalty programs are only just beginning to tap into this world-centric self.

Working with their loyalty marketing departments, CR executives should consider devising projects that further their CR objectives, funded by loyalty points. Social media could be used to encourage collaboration and networking, while game elements (e.g., badges, levels, leaderboards) could provide recognition and status for “Social Me”.

Beyond Social Me (which still seeks personal rewards), there is a third me, the “Altruistic Me” who is more concerned with what can it do for others. Altruistic Me serves a higher purpose (giving back/paying it forward).

CR leaders should consider establishing clear measures for how the success of their customer-funded projects will be determined from the outset and include the development of the tools to measure them into the project if they do not already exist. The same social media that can facilitate collaboration with customers during the funding phase can also be used by companies to share the progress and outcome of loyalty-funded projects during the implementation and operational phases. For Altruistic Me, personal satisfaction is the biggest reward of all.

Bringing it home

Loyalty programs are the key for savvy CR leaders looking to supercharge their CR efforts. They can be used to engage the company’s best customers in CR initiatives, increasing visibility into the causes that matter most to them and the good work they are actually doing. From a loyalty perspective, diversifying loyalty programs makes sense also. By not only offering materialistic rewards but helping customers find the path to social recognition (social rewards) and personal enlightenment (altruistic rewards), companies can distinguish their programs from those of the competition, while satisfying the needs of a new generation of consumers who believe that the best way to do good for themselves is by doing good for others. They can create a truer kind of loyalty, one based on shared values and accomplishments rather than purely financial transactions.

Mark Caduc ( is a successful intrapreneur turned entrepreneur, a technology and innovation leader with a passion for developing corporate strategy, building corporate innovation capabilities and delivering innovative business and technology solutions. He is currently working with purpose-driven companies to engage consumers in corporate initiatives for social and environmental good.

David Clemmons ( is the founder of the voluntourism movement, launching in 2003. Since then he has focused on delivering and sharing information and research with practitioners, students, academics, community representatives and travelers from across the globe on the integration of voluntary service with travel. His insights on voluntourism have been reproduced worldwide in multiple languages and have helped to shape policy, guide research, generate debate, and educate the media.

For more information on loyalty-funded corporate responsibility, visit

[1] “The 2015 Colloquy Loyalty Census: Big Numbers, Big Hurdles”, Jeff Berry, February, 2015.

[2] “Billion Member March: The 2011 Colloquy Loyalty Census”,, Hlavinka & Sullivan, Apr 2011.

Friday, June 10, 2016

Sessions on CSR: Sustainable Brands 2016 Conference Recap

CR Magazine attended Sustainable Brands 2016 conference in San Diego this week. The event is a gathering of global sustainability and brand professionals with a focus on understanding and leveraging the role of brands in shaping the future.

Some highlights of the event included special sessions on topics like Product-Level Supply Chain Metrics; Understanding Maturity Levels of a Sustainability Program; Purpose Driven Influence; Generation Startup Entrepreneurship; Data, Design and Process; The Power of a Transformative Sustainable Strategy; Aligning the UN Sustainable Development Goals with Brand Strategy; Transparency, Sustainability and Community Engagement; How Acquisitions can Change Internal Dynamics Around Sustainability; The Rise of Bio Materials and Bio Products; and more. 

CR Magazine met with a lot of important people and thought leaders in the industry, and learned about the efforts of many successful brands. Look for a full recap in the next issue of the magazine. 

One exciting item on display at the show was the Pure Power PW1000G engine with Pratt & Whitney's Geared Turbofan technology, which will make air travel cleaner, quieter and greener, the company says. According to United Technologies Corp., the engine offers a 75 percent reduction in noise, 50 percent reduction in regulated emissions and 16 percent reduction in fuel consumption. Both companies are excited for the revolutionary changes this engine will bring to the air travel industry.

In the Activation Hub, many companies hosted booths featuring their products and services. Target had a lounge area with the Made to Matter products. The company teamed up with 20 brands to create innovative products with a purpose.

At night, the fun and action continued, with a special performance by the band March Fourth at a beachside BBQ. Attendees danced, ate, and made s'mores by the firepits along the shore.

CR Magazine enjoyed the event, and was glad to connect with people in the CSR industry. We hope they will join us in October in New York City for our own event, the COMMIT!Forum.

Thursday, June 9, 2016

Insights from Savers' State of Reuse Report

It’s no secret that environmental sustainability doesn’t happen overnight; often, attitudes need to change and awareness needs to expand in order to make an impact on the national or global level. The adoption and awareness of sustainable practices such as recycling have expanded rapidly over the past few decades, representing a significant milestone on the road to environmental sustainability in North America and beyond, but will recycling be enough?

According to Savers’ recent State of Reuse Report, which surveyed 3,000 North Americans about their sustainability behaviors and perceptions of reuse, many consumers do not understand the concept of reuse or the environmental impact it can have in the long run. Specifically, the survey revealed lingering misconceptions about the impact of reuse, especially for clothing and textiles, as well as a lack of awareness about the options available for keeping these items out of landfills. Here are a few of the survey findings:

  • Almost half of North Americans believe they have too much stuff.
  • Americans vastly underestimate the amount of used clothing and accessories they send to landfills each year: They report throwing away 4.7 trash bags worth, while the actual amount is nearly double at 8.1 trash bags.
  • 1 in 3 people don’t know that more than 90 percent of textiles can be reused or recycled.
  • Of people who do not donate used goods, one in three say it’s just more convenient to throw these items away.
  • More than half of North Americans surveyed say they are more likely to reuse clothing after hearing about the significant environmental impact of textile manufacturing.

This lack of awareness of reuse (compared to the widespread understanding of recycling) is significant because reuse is often the more impactful option.  Reuse reduces the need for production and additional natural resources. It is also a critical part of a “circular economy,” which, as the Ellen MacArthur Foundation notes in the report, relies on items staying “at their highest utility” and out of landfills.

Despite the alarming trend towards unawareness, the survey results also indicate positive perceptions of reuse and those who practice it overall. Likewise, it seems that after being educated on the difference between reusing and recycling and the potential impact of the former, consumers are more than willing to take that knowledge and change their habits for the better.